Roomba 675 vs 690 Comparison Review
However, we have a few affordable models, and today we compare Roomba 675 vs 690 which cost around $300.
On the other hand, Roomba 675 is a newer model and still packs Wi-Fi as the major feature. But is it better than Roomba 690?
That’s what we are about to find out in this Roomba comparison review.
Roomba 690 Works with Alexa
Released together with the Roomba 890, the 690 reigned as the cheapest smart Roomba. The earlier version, the 650 had every other desirable features except for Wi-Fi and Alexa compatibility.
Regarding cleaning performance, this vacuum cleaner packs the AeroVac 3-stage cleaning system. It boasts a 1st Gen motor that combines with the dual multisurface brush system for thorough bare floor cleaning.
For allergy sufferers, we also have AeroVac filters and, even though they are not 99% efficient like true HEPA filters, it’s worth the price.
When it comes to convenience, Roomba 690 has a 60 minutes runtime. It will recharge automatically but won’t resume cleaning.
It supports 2.4GHz Wi-Fi for Smartphone app compatibility as well as Alexa operation.
We like the iAdapt 1.0 navigation system though it will get the Roomba stuck a few times here and there. Gladly, you have Virtual Walls, and one node is supplied in the package.
This Roomba 690 is ideal for a range of cleaning needs. It can handle bare floors low carpet pile, and pet hair. If you have a small to medium apartments with few furniture, it is also a great purchase.
Roomba 675 an Excellent Deal
This is a pretty new model that was released to help Roomba stay afloat after discontinuing the other old Roomba 600 series robot vacuums. This one too has Wi-Fi and packs most of the standard features.
One significant difference is regarding boundary marking. Roomba 690 and 890 come with only one Virtual Walls device but the 675 comes with none.
When it gets to the cleaning performance, we see nothing different from the old Roomba 690. It still maintains the 1st Generation motor that delivers an average of 600 pa. The brush system is still the same, and so is the filtration.
Even though this Roomba comes with the same iAdapt navigation system, it’s floor mapping is a little more advanced. At least it doesn’t move randomly like older models courtesy of updated software.
There are two large wheels for easy transitioning from the floor to carpets. A roller wheel at the front also makes turning a buzz.
Roomba 675 is an excellent deal if you really need Virtual Walls and you don’t want to spend more on an extra node to make it a pair. If you have large apartments, and many rooms, buy the Roomba 675.
Roomba 690 vs. Roomba 675 Head-to-Head Comparison
DESIGN, DIMENSIONS & AESTHETICS
The design of a vacuum cleaner is very important. Even though it doesn’t contribute directly to the cleaning performance, it determines where the Roomba will reach, and where it won’t reach. The aesthetics also matter even though this is a personal choice.
The 675 is also round shaped and comes with a side brush to clean the wall edges and deep corners as well. When it comes to dimensions, it has a 13-inch diameter and stands at 3.6-inches high. Regarding weight, the 675 weighed just the same as the 690; 7.8lbs. The finish is different from the 690 as it has a dark grey color with black accents.
The most important consideration when buying a robot vacuum is the cleaning performance. Just like all other cleaners, the cleaning performance is determined by an amalgam of aspects.
In this section, we are going to look at all these factors and how each contributes to the overall performance of the vacuum.
We will also share the cleaning tests results to highlight how each model performs in a real household setting.
When buying, make sure the vacuum suits all your cleaning needs.
So, how does Roomba 675 compare to the 690?
There’s no much difference in the newer Roomba 675. It shares most of the features with the 690, so it’s also designed for bare floors, low -pile carpets and pet hair.
The navigation and autonomy is suited for rooms with minimal traffic and small apartments.
A good vacuum cleaner should have a powerful, and efficient motor. It should also operate quietly.
On the other hand, Roomba 675 has maintained the 1st Generation motor which also delivers an average of 550Pa.
The operation is quiet as well, but you can only rely on this vacuum for bare floor and low pile carpet vacuuming.
The brush system works hand in hand with the motor. While the brush agitates dirt, the suction picks up the dirt. There’s also a side brush that sweeps dirt into the path of the vacuum ready for suctioning.
So, how do the two Roomba’s compare here?
The new Roomba 675 also boasts a dual multisurface brush system.
However, this time round, it is not s bristle brush, but rubber extractors which are gentle on hard floors like hardwood, but it will still tangle if you constantly deal with the long dog hairs.
There’s also a sweeping side brush for the wall edges and deep corners where the round shape design of the Roomba won’t allow it to reach.
Robot vacuums, just like the canisters and upright vacuums don’t only pick up dirt, they also get rid of the bad odor, and most importantly the allergens.
The best system is true HEPA filtration which is 99.97% efficient compared to their HEPA style counterparts that are 85-90% efficient.
The same filtration system has been retained in the Roomba 675.
It can capture the mild allergens and other bad odors but not as efficiently as the advanced Roomba’s with AeroForce HEPA filter, for example, the Roomba 890 and 980.
One unique feature iRobot vacuums have is dirt detection. This system automatically detects where there is dirt and switches the Roomba to spot mode for intensive cleaning.
So far, iRobot has developed two Dirt Detect systems.
- The first is called Dirt Detect 1.0 (Series I)which uses acoustic sensors to detect dirt.
- The other system is Dirt Detect 2.0 which combines acoustic and optical sensors.
The 675 also has the Dirt Detect Series I and even though there’s a better system, it is still a great deal considering other brands don’t offer this feature.
As usual, we did comprehensive cleaning tests on different surfaces, using everyday household dirt.
We tested the two vacuums on the hardwood, low pile carpet, and high pile carpet. We used Cheerios, sugar, flour, rice, kitty litter, sand and pet hair.
So, how did they perform?
Hardwood floor test
On the hardwood, Roomba 675 and 690 did an excellent job picking up all the dirt we put on their way.
The only hurdle seemed to be the flour. They both left a cloudy patch because of the tiny particles that couldn’t be picked up. But after several passes, everything vanished.
Low pile carpet test
On low pile, the two Roombas also did a great job. All the large dirt debris including Cheerios were picked up without any problem.
However, with the small dirt particles like sugar and flour, as well as kitty litter, the two struggled, but at the end of the day, they managed to collect most of the dirt.
High pile carpet test
This was the ultimate test and one which greatly overwhelmed the two Roombas. High pile requires powerful vacuum power to flush out the dirt that hides deep inside the pile and long strands.
Unfortunately, the Roomba 675 and 690 lack powerful suction. They picked up Cheerios only.
The rest of the dirt we’re not picked up very well, and that’s the reason we have always insisted that you get the special vacuums for carpets, for example, Roomba 980 or the Botvac Connected D7.
There are several aspects that you need to consider when assessing the convenience of a robot vacuum.
Robot vacuums are cordless meaning they have rechargeable batteries that power the motor. That means you have to consider the runtime it offers and most importantly, power management.
The newer Roomba 675 also comes with the 1800mAh battery that lasts around an hour, same as Roomba 690. This vacuum will also recharge automatically, but it lacks the resume function. So, if you have a large apartment, this is not the best option. Pick the Roomba 960 or 980 as they resume cleaning after recharging.
The 675 also supports 2.4Ghz WiFi for Smartphone operation as well as Alexa. Even though the new Roomba models will have wireless updates, it’s not confirmed whether the 675 will also support these updates.
The 675 also comes with the scheduling function. It will also be programmed from the App or manually using buttons. Unfortunately, you can program it to clean once daily only.
NAVIGATION AND MANEUVERABILITY
Robot vacuums work independently. You don’t have to push it or operate it manually like canisters or upright vacuums. When choosing a vacuum cleaner, there are several things to consider as far as navigation and maneuverability are concerned.
The navigation system is an integral part of the vacuum cleaner. iRobot is famous for developing a sophisticated navigation system. The brand is renowned for its patented iAdapt navigation system.
There are three systems:
- iAdapt 2.0,
- iAdapt 3.0.
Roomba 675 also comes with the old iAdapt 1.0 navigation despite being released just recently. Just like the 690, don’t expect it to navigate without hitting obstacles here and there.
In the case of Roomba 675, the scanning and mapping system is still based on iAdapt 1.0. However, we noted that it is at least intelligent and makes better decisions because of the upgraded software.
There are instances where you will need to contain your robot vacuum. Maybe you don’t want it to go near the dog’s feeding area or other restricted zones.
So, how do you go about this?
But do all Roomba 600 series come with this technology?
On the other hand, the Roomba 675 doesn’t come with any Virtual Walls node supplied with the package. But it has been designed to work with Virtual Walls technology. So if you will need boundary marking, you will need to purchase a pair of Virtual Walls, and that means extra budget.
WINNER: Roomba 690 or 675?
We have come to the end of this Roomba 675 vs. 690 comparison review. It is now time to declare the winner between these two cheap Roomba’s.
The Roomba 690 is the ultimate winner here as it comes with a Virtual Walls node. That is what gives it the edge over Roomba 675 which doesn’t come with a node, but the robot vacuum itself can work with Virtual Walls that you’ll have to buy separately. So, if you will need to contain your robot vacuum, the 690 is the best.
While the Roomba 690 wins the battle of features, the 675 can’t be ruled out just yet. If you’re looking for a budget robot vacuum, it is the best. Thought they are another within the same budget range, the 675 is slightly cheaper because it has sacrificed the Virtual Walls device.
Roomba 690 vs. 675 vs. 890
The two 600 series Roomba vacuums are very identical in terms of performance. But how do they compare to the more advanced 800 series, specifically the Roomba 890?
Here are the similarities and differences of Roomba 600 and 675 vs. 890.
Roomba 600 vs. 800 Similarities
- Design – There are no worthy differences in terms of the design of these vacuums. The difference in color and dimensions are very minimal.
- Navigation and mapping – The three vacuums share the same iAdapt 1.0 navigation and floor mapping system.
- Runtime – These Roombas are also sharing the same 1800mAh battery, and that means the runtime is also the same.
- Smart connectivity – Roomba 690, 675 and 890 have 2.4GHZ WiFi for Smartphone operation. They are also compatible with Alexa and Google Assistant.
Roomba 600 vs. 800 Differences
- Vacuum power – The advantage of Roomba 890 is that it comes with the 2nd Generation motor that delivers 5* more air power (1000Pa) just like Roomba 960. However, the two Roba 600 vacuums have a 1st Generation motor.
- Filtration system – Roomba 690 and 675 have HEPA style filtration system (AeroVac) while the 890 has true HEPA filtration system (AeroForce).
- Dirt Detection – The Roomba 890 also has the advanced Dirt Detect Series II while the 675 and 690 have Dirt Detect Series I.
Indeed, Roomba’s are very expensive. However, models like the 690 and 675 offer a cheap venue for homeowners on a budget.