Key Differences Between Roborock Saros 10R and Dreame X50 Ultra
- Suction Power: The Roborock Saros 10R has 19,000Pa suction, excelling on hard floors (98% debris pickup) but slightly weaker on thick carpets (90%). The Dreame X50 Ultra’s 20,000Pa suction performs better on carpets (95% sand removal) but is marginally less effective on hard floors (96%).
- Obstacle Avoidance: The Saros 10R’s StarSight 2.0 system scores a perfect 24/24 in obstacle avoidance tests, navigating around toys and cords flawlessly. The X50 Ultra scores 20/24, occasionally misidentifying debris like crumbs as cords, requiring a second pass.
- Threshold Climbing: The X50 Ultra’s ProLeap system climbs thresholds up to 2.36 inches (60 mm) with two steps or 1.65 inches (42 mm) single steps, outperforming the Saros 10R’s AdaptiLift chassis, which manages 1.57 inches (40 mm).
- Mopping Performance: The X50 Ultra’s dual spinning mops with detergent-dispensing dock leave no residue on sticky stains like ketchup. The Saros 10R’s VibraRise 4.0 mopping system leaves slight streaks due to its lack of detergent support.
- Height and Clearance: The Saros 10R, at 3.14 inches (79.8 mm) without a top-mounted LiDAR, fits under lower furniture. The X50 Ultra’s retractable LiDAR lowers it to 3.5 inches (89.5 mm), still effective but less compact.
- Dock Features: The X50 Ultra’s dock includes UV sterilization and anti-limescale systems for enhanced hygiene. The Saros 10R’s dock lacks these, relying on standard hot water washing and drying.
- Price: The Saros 10R retails at ~$1,599, slightly cheaper than the X50 Ultra’s ~$1,699, offering better value for similar premium features.
Key Similarities Between Models
- Navigation Technology: Both use advanced LiDAR with AI-driven cameras for precise 3D mapping, multi-floor storage, and real-time path planning.
- Multi-Function Docks: Both feature self-emptying docks (2.15L–3.2L dustbags), hot water mop washing, warm air drying, and auto water refilling.
- Anti-Tangle Brushes: Both employ detangling brush systems (Saros 10R’s DuoDivide, X50 Ultra’s HyperStream DuoBrush) to handle pet and human hair effectively.
- Smart Features: Both support apps with live video, customizable cleaning modes, no-mop zones, and compatibility with Alexa and Google Assistant.
- Mopping Design: Both use dual spinning mop pads with extendable side mops for thorough edge and corner cleaning.
- Battery Life: Both have 6,400 mAh batteries, providing 180–300 minutes of runtime, ideal for large homes.
Conclusion
The Roborock Saros 10R edges out the Dreame X50 Ultra as the better choice for most users due to its flawless obstacle avoidance (24/24 score), excellent hard-floor cleaning (98% debris pickup), and slightly lower price (~$1,599 vs. ~$1,699).
Its ultra-slim 3.14-inch profile navigates under low furniture effortlessly, making it ideal for homes with tight spaces. However, the X50 Ultra excels in carpet cleaning with its 20,000Pa suction and superior threshold climbing (2.36 inches vs. 1.57 inches), suiting homes with varied floor heights. Its mopping system, enhanced by a detergent-dispensing dock with UV sterilization, outperforms the Saros 10R on sticky stains.
The X50 Ultra’s dock hygiene features are a bonus for allergy-conscious users. For budget-conscious buyers or those prioritizing hard floors and obstacle avoidance, the Saros 10R offers the best value and reliability. The X50 Ultra is preferable for carpet-heavy homes or complex layouts requiring robust threshold climbing and mopping.