360 S6 vs. 360 S7 vs. Roborock S6 Comparison Review
For some time now, Roborock has dominated the Chinese robot vacuums market. But recently, another top Chinese robot vacuum brand, 360, was spotted in the US market.
At the moment, there is a serious battle that pits Xiaomi’s Roborock vs. 360. In this article, we have compared the two best 360 vacuums against the best Chinese robot vacuum.
Without further ado, here is a detailed 360 S5 vs. 360 S7 vs. Roborock S6 face to face comparison review.
Such diversity is possible thanks to extremely high 2200 Pa suction and triple brushes. Pet hair collection is also included.
The S5 bot runs in neat rows and intelligently navigates with LiDAR Mapping Technology. Moreover, it builds room maps and can store up to 10 such plans for various floors.
Mapping technology means users can also enjoy all app plan functions, including Selective Room Cleaning and No-Go Zones.
And if your hands are busy, you can also control the bot with your voice through Alexa and Google Assistant.
Cleaning goes pretty quick, and the charge is enough for 90 minutes of non-stop operation. After the battery dies, the robot will return to the station. This is the Self-Charge and Resume function.
The only drawbacks we found concern filter, bin, and noise level. The unit doesn’t feel very quiet. And though the battery is powerful, it won’t last if you clean two and more floors at once. So does a bin, which can hold under 600 ml – regular emptying will be needed.
Finally, we like an H11 compound washable filter. But if you have pets, children or suffer from allergies, it won’t save you from hazardous air particles.
Anyway, the 360 S5 vacuum is highly recommended for large, multi-story houses with mixed flooring. It’s nice for pet hair. It’s great for dwellings with complicated furnishing and construction. It’s perfect for intelligent remote control. Besides, it costs under $300 – an almost impossibly low price for such functionality.
- vacuums all floor types
- suits pet owners
- ensures extreme suction with 4 level adjustment
- intelligently navigates thanks to the laser system
- remembers up to 10 floor maps
- allows for setting cleaning schedule, Selective Room Cleaning and No-Go Zones
- charges automatically and resumes cleaning
- supports app and voice control
- a bit loud
- small dustbin
- one would expect a more powerful battery for multi-story cleaning
- no anti-allergen air treatment
Welcome an improved 360 S device with combined dry and wet cleaning functions! The S7 Pro cleaner boasts 2-in-1 cleaning for separate or simultaneous vacuuming and mopping, which is its main advantage.
The manufacturer kept the same navigation system with Multi-Floor Mapping, LiDAR orientation, No-Go and No-Mop Zones, and Selective Room Cleaning.
It’s suction that changed. The new bot now provides up to 2650 Pa power. Besides, it boasts Automatic Carpet Detection and a tangle-free brush that improves carpet cleaning.
Also, engineers took into account the battery issue of the previous S5 model and gifted us a more powerful energy source. A reinforced 120 min battery is able to support both multi-floor cleaning and energy-consuming mopping.
An H11 filter, dustbin, Self-Charge and Resume, app control, Alexa and Google Assistant support are traditionally included.
360 S7 Pro cleaner will cost us over $400, which is a con for many customers. We also face noisy operation, small bin capacity, and no allergen collection again. But in this device, we pay for amazing 2-in-1 cleaning, high suction with improved brush and carpet detection as well as better battery. Truly worthy improvements, aren’t they?
- provides both vacuuming and mopping
- cleans hard floors, carpets, and pet hair
- new Automatic Carpet Detection
- boasts increased suction with the same 4 level adjustment
- an improved tangle-free brush
- laser navigation and Multi-Floor Mapping
- supports schedule, Selective Room Cleaning, No-Go and No-Mop Zones
- a more powerful battery
- charges automatically and resumes cleaning
- supports app and voice control
- still noisy
- dustbin capacity was not improved
- cannot eliminate allergens
Roborock S6 is very similar to the 360 S7 model as it also provides dry and wet cleaning. The only things are a smaller dustbin and water tank.
Chinese brands seem to like laser navigation, so Roborock also equips its models with Lidar Navigation. A robot of such level cannot do without Multi-Mapping and consequent Selective Room Cleaning, No-Go and No-Mop zoning.
2000 Pa suction, silicone brush, and Carpet Boost make it a nice option for any floors, including medium-piled carpets.
The reasons we love Roborock S6 are top air filtration and tremendously durable battery. Finally, users get a high-efficiency filter capable of catching allergen particles. And the unit can last up to 180 minutes, which is a record of our review.
Thus, Roborock S6 is a choice for pet owners and people with allergies. Try this model if you don’t want to interrupt cleaning for recharging. And certainly, try it if you want to get two robotic cleaning machines in one case for $400 only.
- also supports dry and wet cleaning modes
- treats all floor types
- boasts Carpet Boost
- excellent pet hair cleaning
- excellent air filtration with allergen removal
- a full pack of smart technologies, including Lidar Navigation, Multi-Floor Mapping, and app control
- consequently, Selective Room Cleaning and No-Go zoning supported
- extremely durable battery with self-charging function
- provides voice control through Alexa and Google Assistant
- even smaller dustbin and water tank
- some users complain about improper map work
1. Design and Aesthetics
As far as the design goes, the important things to consider are the shape and dimensions. Aesthetics is not so important as it does not influence the cleaning performance. So, how do the three vacuums compare here? And can you tell the difference from their physical appearance?
The S7 is not different from the S5 as it is also round shaped with the same dimensions, 13.7 x 13.8 x 3.9 inches. But regarding the weight, it is slightly heavier at 8.38lbs. Please ignore the reviews that suggest it is 11lbs. As for the aesthetics, this vacuum is in plain white and a thin orange accent surrounding it.
2. Cleaning Performance
When it comes to cleaning performance, the first thing to consider is cleaning orientation. Next up is the components, which include the motor, brushes, and filters, as well as the cleaning modes.
This vacuum prefers to focus on vacuuming only. Consequently, we get no water tanks and mopping cloths. But when it comes to suction power, this vacuum impresses even more with a yield of 2200pa powered motor with 4 suction levels. The bin has a 0.6L capacity, while the filtration is based on a simpler H11 filter.
3. Cleaning Tests
As usual, we do thorough tests on all robot vacuums we review. We tested the three vacuums on bare floors and carpets using the common household dirt, and below are the results. Find out which is the best performing vacuum in this Roborock S6 vs. 360 S5 vs. 360 S7 comparison review.
This is all about the power management of the robot vacuums. Here, we will compare aspects like battery technology, capacity, runtime, recharging, and life cycle. So, which is the best choice in this 360 S5 vs. 360 S7 vs. Roborock S6 vacuum comparison?
The S5, on the other hand, tags along with a smaller 2600mAh lithium-ion rechargeable battery. The battery lasts for 90 minutes maximum. As expected from such a high-end vacuum, the S5 will recharge and resume cleaning automatically. As for the battery’s life cycle, it should serve you for 12 months or so if you take proper care of it.
5. Navigation, Mapping and Boundary Mapping
Robot vacuums operate autonomously courtesy of a navigation system that enables it to detect and avoid obstacles, as well as falls. The floor mapping and scanning system, as well as the ability to learn the layout of your home, is essential. Lastly, we also considered the boundary marking technology.
Next up is the S5, which uses an LDS Lidar algorithm just like Roborock. The LDS comes in handy for localization while the bumpers and sensors are for cliff and obstacle detection. When it comes to floor mapping, the 360 S5 will also learn and adapt to your floor plan, saving a maximum of 10 maps courtesy of an AI-powered software. Just like Roborock, it uses a systematic cleaning path and will not skip any spots on the floor.
6. Smart Features
A good robot vacuum should be smart home ready. This gives homeowners the privilege to operate them remotely via the respective mobile apps and other smart home operation devices.
The new S7 is not different from the 360 S5 as it also tags along with Wi-Fi for smartphone app operation and Alexa compatibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best robot vacuum for carpets?
What is the most affordable robot cleaner?
What is the difference between Roborock 360 S6 vs 360 S7?
What is the difference between Roborock 360 S5 vs 360 S7?
Secondly, the S7 got improved cleaning performance with higher suction (2650 Pa vs 2200 Pa), tangle-free brush and Carpet Detection (which the earlier S5 lacks).
And thirdly, while the S5 lasts for 90 minutes of non-stop work, the S7 Pro runs for 120 minutes.
Roborock 360 S7 vs Roborock S6: which robot has longer run time?
Winner: 360 S5 vs. 360 S7 vs. Roborock S6
As we have always mentioned in our reviews, the Chinese robot vacuum cleaners offer better value for money compared to the European and US brands. But between the three vacuums, which one is the best? That’s what we are about to discover in this closing segment of this 360 S5 vs. 360 S7 vs. Roborock S6.
To start, the 360 S5 will definitely not be the best as it’s quite an old model from 360. However, it definitely deserves our attention for excellent price and more than sufficient performance.
The advantage of the 360 S7 is the larger bin and the fact that it can save up to 10 maps. But then, the Roborock S6 has more practical advantages compared to it. First, you will like the advanced mopping system that offers two mopping settings. The other advantage, and perhaps the main reason why the Roborock S6 is superior in this discussion, is the longer runtime.